Bidder Inquiries

Caltrans Bidding Connect Account:

Sign In (Sign in is required to access Project Plans)

Create Account (Click here to create a Caltrans Bidding Connect Account)


Viewing inquiries for 04-0P9204

Submit new inquiry for this project


Inquiry #1: Will Caltrans pay for Water Pollution Control Program?
Inquiry submitted 09/17/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 09/17/2024


Response #2:See added bid item #92, ADDENDUM #1.
Response posted 10/11/2024




Inquiry #2: The quantity for Item #50, Drill & Bond Dowel seems to be significantly overstated. Please confirm if the plan quantity is correct.
Inquiry submitted 10/11/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/11/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #3: 1. The Grind Tables on Sheets 90-93, in many cases, show the “Top of Prepared Surface Elev” as higher or lower than the “Top of Exist Concrete Elev”. Section 60-3.02 of the Standards indicates to prepare the deck you abrasive blast with steel shot (and I do not see this modified in the Specials). How does the deck get higher (or lower) after bead blasting?
Inquiry submitted 10/14/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/14/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #4: The quantity for Prepare Concrete Bridge Deck Surface, Bid Item 57, of 44,269 SF seems high. Can you double check this quantity? Bridge, with approach slabs is 238’ long x 149’ wide.


Inquiry submitted 10/14/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/14/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #5: Can high early strength concrete (3,000 PSI @ 24 hours) be substituted for Rapid Set Concrete if necessary?
Inquiry submitted 10/14/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/14/2024


Response #2:Refer to Note 2 under “Deck Repair Detail” on sheet 88 of 103 of the contract plans. Bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/15/2024




Inquiry #6: Note 2 on Sheet 34 includes "....POLYESTER CONCRETE OVERLAY..." This page is for the Southbound 55 hour closure work. Is there actually Polyester Concrete Overlay in the Southbound direction?
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024




Inquiry #7: Is the 1,200 psi at "age of break" listed in Section 51-1.01D(2)(b)(iii) Mock-ups for the Rapid Set Concrete deck the minimum strength needed to open the new deck to traffic?
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024


Response #2:Refer to the definition of “opening age” and “age of break” under section 51-1.01B, “Definitions,” of the Standard Specifications and section 51-1.01D(2)(b)(ii), “Prequalification of Mix Design,” of the Standard Specifications. Bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/21/2024




Inquiry #8: As a follow up to Question #5, can High Early Strength Concrete (3,000 psi in 24 hours) be substituted for RSC for the new bridge deck overlays?
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024


Response #2:No further information will be provided. Bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #9: Can the drilling for the Drill and Bond Dowels for the new Rapid Strength Concrete [deck] Overlays be done in conventional lane closures in advance of the 55 hours closures?
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024


Response #2:No further information will be provided. Bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/21/2024




Inquiry #10: Sorry, question #6 should have referenced page 37 not page 34.
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024


Response #2:Noted.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #11: What is the drill and bond spacing at the centerline of the girder bays? The Dowel Layout on Sheet 94 shows them at 12" o.c. but Detail "D" on the same sheet shows them at 24" o.c. Note they are all drawn (if to scale) at 24".
Inquiry submitted 10/16/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/16/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #12: The conform for 680 SB (Pavement Conform Detail B) on Sheet C-2 shows RHMA-O to be used for the conform, however on the Layout Sheet L-1 and on the Summary of Quantities Sheet Q-1 it shows this to be Type A HMA. Please confirm which is correct.
Inquiry submitted 10/17/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #13: For the approach slab conforms on 680 SB, Detail B on Sheet C-2 calls out RHMA-O, however on the Layout Sheet L-1 and the Summary of Quantities Sheet Q-1, Type A HMA is shown. Please clarify which is correct.
Inquiry submitted 10/17/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/17/2024




Inquiry #14: Regarding item #70 Midwest Guardrail System (Wood Post). The only 8' wood post available in the Cal Trans standard drawings is a 10X10 X8'. That post would typically be used in a WB-31 or a strengthened railing application. Please confirm Cal Trans wants 10 X 10 X 8' wood posts installed for all of the MGS on this project. There are 8' steel posts available in the standard drawings for narrow roadway applications. (A77N3 Detail B)
Inquiry submitted 10/20/2024

Response #1:The inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/21/2024


Response #2:Yes, 10 X 10 X 8' wood posts are to be installed for all of the MGS on this project as per the plans and bid items.
Response posted 10/21/2024




Inquiry #15: Can you provide a detail for the Type 842A Modified Barrier Rail?
Inquiry submitted 10/21/2024

Response #1:Your inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/21/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/23/2024




Inquiry #16: Please advise what Item encompasses the payment for the required Barrier Transitions -
Inquiry submitted 10/21/2024

Response #1:Your inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/21/2024


Response #2:Unless an addendum is issued, please bid per the current contract bid documents.
Response posted 10/23/2024




Inquiry #17: The SC pages of the plans detail the use of contrast striping on concrete surfaces for Temporary Traffic Stripes. However, the quantities chart on SCQ-1 does not specify that the tape is to be contrast.

Please confirm whether the Temporary Traffic Stripe tape is required to be contrast, as indicated in the SC pages, or if standard tape is acceptable.

Inquiry submitted 10/24/2024

Response #1:Your inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/24/2024




Inquiry #18: Could Caltrans please clarify if the plan pages for Stage 3 Phase 2 and Stage 4 Phase 2 correspond to the PD pages and the values listed on the PDQ pages? If so, could Caltrans also clarify what SC-6, SC-7, SC-9, and SC-10 correspond to within those stages, if they indeed align with the PD pages?
Inquiry submitted 10/24/2024

Response #1:Your inquiry has been received and submitted for consideration.
Response posted 10/24/2024


The information provided in the responses to bidder inquiries is not a waiver of Section 2-1.07, "JOB SITE AND DOCUMENT EXAMINATION" of the Standard Specifications or any other provision of the contract, nor to excuse the contractor from full compliance with the contract. Bidders are cautioned that subsequent responses or contract addenda may change a previous response.